Moderator: coldharvest
I suppose all those video clips of those reporters were "actors"
I could write a whole essay on the flaws in the film, but you guys in your usual style would comeback with "is not" or "you're ignorant" so I really don't see the point. Funny thing is that there are many legitimate and damning criticisms of the Bush admin to make, but you guys in your haste to find an overarching conspiracy miss most of the legitimate evidence.
Suffice to say that my personal favourite part of the movie was about halfway through it when the narator mentions that several people saw "islamic looking guys" at the Federal Building. I think he meant to say "middle eastern looking."
There were a few interesting pieces of information in the documentary that could warrant further research, but the writer mixes it in with spurious argument which detracts from his point.
There is at least a mistake, a persuasive ploy, a non sequitur or a spurious conclusion drawn for almost every minute of that film.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests