Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

The Black Flag Cafe is the place travelers come to share stories and advice. Moderated by Robert Young Pelton the author of The World's Most Dangerous Places.

Moderator: coldharvest

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby ROB » Thu Jan 28, 2016 5:17 am

So we're going to send in the troops for what people say rather than what they do.

You people are gold.
User avatar
ROB
BFCus Regularus
 
Posts: 6232
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:49 am

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby Kurt » Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:56 am

ROB wrote:So we're going to send in the troops for what people say rather than what they do.

You people are gold.


The troops were sent in because they occupied, with weapons, Federal and Public land. So in the US saying stuff. Not a cause for sending in the troops. Saying stuff while armned is not a cause for sending in the troops. Inciding violence while armed is only a cause when violence actually happens...so not a cause. But armed occupancy of land that you do not own is a reason to send in the troops. Not one I favor, but there is legal precedent for it.

With Waco years ago that was people who did not say stuff but was alleged by informers and it is very likely statutory rape happened on that land but stat rape (consensual sex with someone older than 12 but younger than 16 or 17) is not a good reason to send in the tanks. So there is a precedent for the US to do stuff like this. The MOVE organization in Philadelphia even had it worse.

This could have been solved early if Obama had pardoned the Hammond family so they would not have to return to prison 9 years later to servce 5 years on top of the six months they served in 2006.

The lesson is if you do not want lunaticks fighting the law then do not enforce crazy laws.
User avatar
Kurt
In Manus Manus
 
Posts: 22025
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 6:29 am
Location: New York City

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby svizzerams » Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:18 pm

Image

http://www.salon.com/2016/01/27/oregon_ ... _them_out/

The minute that self-appointed militiamen stepped onto the property of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, liberals started worrying that these folks would not be held accountable for their criminal behavior. The group, led by the two sons of right wing radical Cliven Bundy, took over the refuge, demanding that the taxpayers turn over federal lands so that folks like the Bundys and other farmers, miners and other private interests could profit handsomely off the land without having to pay for it. It’s clear that the militiamen expected the feds to rush the compound, causing a firefight in which they could be martyrs for the right wing cause of giving white conservatives a lot of free money while leaving the rest of us out to dry.

But that didn’t happen. Instead, the federal government seemingly didn’t do anything for many weeks, letting these guys get comfortable at the refuge and even go back and forth from it for grocery-shopping, media events, and whatever else their hearts desired. Only one occupier was arrested, for using a stolen vehicle to drive to the store.

This lack of interest in having a big ol’ shootout right away on government property didn’t just disappoint the militiamen. A number of liberal commentators were miffed that the feds seemed to be twiddling their thumbs, often arguing that if the occupiers were people of color, the shootout would have happened already. The criticism had some merit, of course, but the solution for such a double standard isn’t to have more shootouts, so much as it’s an argument against the quick-to-violence reactions law enforcement regrettably has when dealing with non-white suspects.

The occupation was expensive and disruptive, of course, leading the Democratic governor of Oregon to ask for the feds to step in. This only reinforced liberal suspicions that the feds were blowing this off and were not going to hold these yahoos accountable for their actions.

Well, those fears were proven most dramatically wrong Tuesday afternoon, when law enforcement confronted the militiamen on the open highway. A shootout did ensue, which was expected since these folks all have ridiculous martyr fantasies, and one person was killed. So far, there have been eight arrests, and the leaders of this fiasco are in custody. Now the feds have closed in on the refuge, closing roads and access. Without leadership or access to the outside, it won’t be surprising if the rest of the people inside just give up soon enough.

The worrywarts were getting all worked up over nothing. Despite all the hand-wringing over whether the feds were taking this seriously enough, in the end, it turns out that the feds were right and the worrywarts were wrong. Waiting this out a bit, while unfortunately disruptive to the area, ended up being a far more sensible way of dealing with this than trying to raid the wildlife refuge.

Raiding the refuge was always a bad idea. For one thing it would give these wannabe martyrs exactly what they want, an opportunity to get hurt or die at government hands and become fuel for radical right wing propaganda. They even brought children onto the property to raise the stakes. In the past, federal raids under similar circumstances involving children—most notably in Waco—not only resulted in innocent lives being lost, but in providing right wing radicals even more justification to demonize federal authorities.

And while the occupation was disruptive and expensive, it would have been far more costly to give the militia the shootout at the refuge they wanted. These guys bragged about how they anticipated violence. They openly threatened that this would become another Waco. Rushing them at the compound would have caused expensive damage to the building, and possibly a fire if the militiamen made good on these threats. Repairing that would have cost a fortune and kept the refuge employees on leave even longer.

Instead, the feds let the militia get complacent and bored. They let the media attention drift away, forcing the militia to have to take more risks and leave the refuge more to get attention. What looked like federal inattention now looks a whole lot more like it was a trap being set to draw the militia members out.

If so, it worked perfectly. The militia members felt emboldened enough to travel 100 miles away from the refuge, and it was out there, without the shelter of the refuge, the presence of cameras, or the ability to use children or neighbors as human shields, that they were finally nabbed by law enforcement. No expensive destruction of property, no dead kids, no officers killed. Only one would-be martyr lost his life.

But this wasn’t just a success from a damage control perspective, either. The federal strategy also kneecapped the propaganda value of this occupation. As I wrote earlier this month, the lengthy occupation gave the militiamen near-daily opportunities to show the world their true colors, proving that they aren’t manly warriors taking a stand so much as a bunch of clowns playing dress-up.

The arrest is more of the same. Instead of staging some Alamo-inspired last stand in the refuge, they apprehended in the middle of nowhere because they were stupid enough to go on a road trip. The only way this could have been more demoralizing for their cause is if they were wearing adult diapers when they got caught.

The entire debacle isn’t quite over yet. There are still some militia members holed up in the refuge. But their leaders have all been apprehended. Considering what idiots the leaders were, it’s not unreasonable to think the people who were left to hold down the fort are even less capable of managing this situation. The federal strategy of being patient and waiting for an opportunity will most likely continue to pay off.

Instead of being angry that the feds didn’t rush this compound, liberals should use this story to push for smarter, less aggressive policing generally. We’re in the midst, prompted by the Black Lives Matter movement, of a nationwide discussion about the dangers of the “shoot first” philosophy of policing. This story if a perfect example of why it’s better for police to be patient and focused on minimizing damage rather than trying to strong-arm the suspects in every situation. It’s not just the right thing to do, but it’s often the most effective way to get the bad guys without hurting innocent people in the process.
Joan of Arc went to battle with nothing
but the voices in her head
and a well-sharpened sword ~ Charlotte

...those without swords can still die upon them...

Illegitami non carborundum est
User avatar
svizzerams
Rx Rangerette
 
Posts: 6413
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 5:00 am
Location: Drug Goddess of Chelanistan

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby Hitoru » Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:33 pm

ROB wrote:So we're going to send in the troops for what people say rather than what they do.

You people are gold.


What would happen do if a similar armed occupation was to occur in Straya ? Disregarding the fact military grade firearms are heavily restricted there.
What are you? Some short sighted trigger puller? - RR3 .
Mr.wRong.
User avatar
Hitoru
Arbol Basura
 
Posts: 3549
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Tejas

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby nowonmai » Thu Jan 28, 2016 5:06 pm

Hitoru wrote:
ROB wrote:So we're going to send in the troops for what people say rather than what they do.

You people are gold.


What would happen do if a similar armed occupation was to occur in Straya ? Disregarding the fact military grade firearms are heavily restricted there.


So now you're against people being armed? Make your mind up.
User avatar
nowonmai
BFCus Regularus
 
Posts: 11542
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:52 pm

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby Hitoru » Thu Jan 28, 2016 5:20 pm

You're misreading me.
What are you? Some short sighted trigger puller? - RR3 .
Mr.wRong.
User avatar
Hitoru
Arbol Basura
 
Posts: 3549
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Tejas

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby nowonmai » Thu Jan 28, 2016 8:36 pm

Hitoru wrote:You're misreading me.


I get it, you only want people who agree with you to be armed. I feel like that too, in fact I go a step further. I'd be happy to be the only guy with a gun. That way I'll get free donuts and won't get queue barged at Burgerking.

That's the trouble with 'The People' being armed, some of them might make their own definition of what constitutes a foreign or domestic enemy to them and/or the good old US of A. But that's okay because, cheered on by chicken hawk libtards, the gubmint will just go in and whack them.

FUCK YEAH!
User avatar
nowonmai
BFCus Regularus
 
Posts: 11542
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:52 pm

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby Hitoru » Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:00 pm

Dude , you're full of shit. I support everyone who can legally own a firearm to carry anywhere legal to do so.
I applaud the New Black Panthers for doing as such.

Image
What are you? Some short sighted trigger puller? - RR3 .
Mr.wRong.
User avatar
Hitoru
Arbol Basura
 
Posts: 3549
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Tejas

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby nowonmai » Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:29 pm

Like I said, people can be armed, just so long as you agree with them.
User avatar
nowonmai
BFCus Regularus
 
Posts: 11542
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:52 pm

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby Hitoru » Thu Jan 28, 2016 10:02 pm

Like I agree with them.
Such a contrarian, always trying to get my goat.
What are you? Some short sighted trigger puller? - RR3 .
Mr.wRong.
User avatar
Hitoru
Arbol Basura
 
Posts: 3549
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Tejas

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby nowonmai » Thu Jan 28, 2016 10:58 pm

That's just made me hungry. Goat curry. Where can I find a goat curry at this time of night. Probably Edgeware Road but I can't be bothered to venture out so tinned sardines it is.
User avatar
nowonmai
BFCus Regularus
 
Posts: 11542
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:52 pm

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby ROB » Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:08 pm

Hitoru wrote:What would happen do if a similar armed occupation was to occur in Straya ? Disregarding the fact military grade firearms are heavily restricted there.


Fair question and I will attempt to give you a genuine answer.

Nothing. Nothing happens. The cops wait them out. They go home sooner or later - probably later. The end. (I'd imagine the local cop would subsequently visit each of them individually to talk about their firearms). They would probably get a 2 minute spot on evening news the first night then the occasional 10 second update on radio news a few times a week. The press basically wouldn't give them the time of day and I seriously doubt they would continually go out there to get inflammatory quotes from them as they know that would be unhelpful.

Our cops very rarely aim for a blaze of glory ending to these things. They wait because they know time is on their side. Especially in this situation - it wasn't a hostage situation and nobody was in immediate danger.
User avatar
ROB
BFCus Regularus
 
Posts: 6232
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:49 am

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby ROB » Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:08 pm

nowonmai wrote:That's just made me hungry. Goat curry. Where can I find a goat curry at this time of night. Probably Edgeware Road but I can't be bothered to venture out so tinned sardines it is.


You eat curry? From immigrants?

lol
User avatar
ROB
BFCus Regularus
 
Posts: 6232
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:49 am

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby friendlyskies » Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:37 pm

ROB wrote:So we're going to send in the troops for what people say rather than what they do.

You people are gold.


They didn't send in the troops, they set up road blocks, waited the militia out, and pulled two cars full of guys over. Similar to how they arrested that one guy who hijacked a park ranger truck to go to Safeway. That guy was smart, and by smart I mean he didn't attack the cops with a deadly weapon. One of the car's drivers was smart, and by smart, I mean they pulled over and didn't attack the cops with a deadly weapon. Finicum pulled some stupid shit. He didn't stop when pulled over, he drove right through a road block, led the cops on an adrenaline-soaked car chase, then got out of the car and charged the cops, reaching for his Colt 45 in the process. Come on, people. This is the USA. You don't pull a gun on a pissed-off cop. Is this rocket science? No.

Look, everyone else is going to live and most of these knuckleheads aren't even going to be arrested or detained. Finicum won a Darwin Award. I'm not saying that the cop did the right thing, I wasn't there. I'm sure there will be an investigation and perhaps even a trial, because Finicum was an Internet-famous white guy. Maybe dude will be put on administrative leave or whatever they do to cops who shoot people. Who knows. But, in case the moral of the story wasn't clear, don't pull a gun on US law enforcement. Just don't. White privilege only gets you so much leeway and dead people don't get to sue.
"4 cylinder Camaro=communism" El Presidente

"You can smoke salmon but it's not quite the same as smoking heroin." nanuq
User avatar
friendlyskies
Vata Loca
 
Posts: 7459
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:36 pm
Location: Atlantis

Re: Speaking of dumbasses: Sagebrush Rebellion Part deux

Postby nowonmai » Thu Jan 28, 2016 11:54 pm

ROB wrote:
nowonmai wrote:That's just made me hungry. Goat curry. Where can I find a goat curry at this time of night. Probably Edgeware Road but I can't be bothered to venture out so tinned sardines it is.


You eat curry? From immigrants?

lol


That's quite weak.
User avatar
nowonmai
BFCus Regularus
 
Posts: 11542
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 8:52 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Black Flag Cafe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

cron