Moderator: coldharvest
2Charlie wrote:Good for you shining.
Good for you.
And when the jack boots kick your door down for being a uber-versive, you will know the system works.
You are in the middle of a police state that is doing more to police it's own than the bad guys and idiots like you can't see it.
Most of the laws passed over the last couple years have little to do with stopping bad guys/gals, but more to do with tracking the habits and movements of AMERICAN's.
Just another Wal-Mart cruising trailer park offspring are you. After all Saddam and UBL are buds, Saddam was responsible for 9/11 and the people on those jets came from Iraq. Right?
If Rwanda had oil in '94, I bet the Genocide wouldn't of happened.
Saudi Arabia is militarily strong (per se) and able to financially damage the US if they go after their oil.
Iraq was embargoed to nothing and was prime for picking. In my opinion, set up for take over under the guise of sanctions.
I guess what I am getting at Shining, is get a life. Get an education and drop your cock, pull up your socks and take a walk around the block. The laws you believe protect you will serve to observe you. Just for kicks give a cop the bird and see what happens.
Hermann Goering
Tarkan wrote:Hey 2C
word on the street is a lot of the folks resigning from the CIA are more or less being forced out and are leaving while the leaving is good. The CIA is a good example of whats been wrong with US intelligence for the past 20 years...it's been unaccountable, poorly led, and not very successful in it's supposed mission. If some of the rats want to leave on their own accord, good deal. Saves the trouble of firing them later.
Renard wrote:How about section 215 of the Patriot Act, which allow the Feds to search a plethora of personal records without probable cause, a warrant, your consent or your knowledge. What's more is that the person made to hand over your records is gagged, so you would never know this article was ever used on you, unless it is used against you in a court proceeding.
Or section 505, which allows the attorney general to obtain personal records by writing a "national security" letter to the holders of these records, eg, phone company, bank, creditor, etc. The process requires no probable cause or judicial oversight, which means the DOJ could do as they damned well please. Again, there is a gag order on the holders of the records.
These both seem like a pretty dramatic infrigements on personal liberty, notably the right to privacy.
That and warrants, where they are still required, are a lot easier to get now than before Patriot in both criminal and terrorism investigations.
These are just to name the more important rights curtailing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests