Market Performance by President

[ROB]

FDR, Clinton and Obama basically destroy everyone else.

https://www.macrotrends.net/2481/stock- ... -president

[Kurt]

FDR, Clinton and Obama basically destroy everyone else.

https://www.macrotrends.net/2481/stock- ... -president

Biggest Crime drop in NYC was by Progressive DeBlasio.

Of course he had nothing to do with that but neither did Giulliani and Bloomberg. The COVID crime rate increase was lower than in other areas of the US.

Of course the advocates of all these people are idiots because they must say "we'll just smugly let them discover the truth" ...meanwhile those they hope discover and reveal the truth are accusing them of belonging to a satanic cabal of child cannibals.

Belief that Trump won the election when he did not is tame stuff for these people.

[snaark]

Correlation is not causation.

[Kurt]

Correlation is not causation.

My grandma said that when she was dying of cancer.

So, we will sure miss you here, man.

[ROB]

Correlation is not causation.

Profound.

[snaark]

Correlation is not causation.

My grandma said that when she was dying of cancer.

So, we will sure miss you here, man.

Well done, that works so many levels.

[vagabond]

Can we map the market growth to a rise in inequality as well? Whatever happened to "the market is not the economy". Not to mention the way we measure economic growth doesn't exactly go hand-in-hand actually having a healthy society. I'm the extra billions tacked onto Biden's military bill will 'help' the economy but what about the effects of those billions not going to helping children have the ability to not starve? How do we account for that in 'the market'?

[Tarkan]

Can we map the market growth to a rise in inequality as well?

Anyone read any Peter Turchin?

[snaark]

Correlating economic indicators with political leadership is almost always stoopid because economic reforms take years to take effect. Gerhard Schröder made painful reforms in Germany, and promptly lost his job for it. Angela Merkel spent 16 years taking credit for them.

[vagabond]

Correlating economic indicators with political leadership is almost always stoopid because economic reforms take years to take effect. Gerhard Schröder made painful reforms in Germany, and promptly lost his job for it. Angela Merkel spent 16 years taking credit for them.

Didn't Schröder fail up by kissing Putin's ass and making a few mil a year?

[ROB]

Correlating economic indicators with political leadership is almost always stoopid because economic reforms take years to take effect.

Utter bullshit. Hell, some people trade on DAILY fiscal flows.

[snaark]

Correlating economic indicators with political leadership is almost always stoopid because economic reforms take years to take effect. Gerhard Schröder made painful reforms in Germany, and promptly lost his job for it. Angela Merkel spent 16 years taking credit for them.

Didn't Schröder fail up by kissing Putin's ass and making a few mil a year?

Yup, Schröder is a cunt and probably the worst example of a German Russland Versteher. But that's another matter :)

[snaark]

Correlating economic indicators with political leadership is almost always stoopid because economic reforms take years to take effect.

Utter bullshit. Hell, some people trade on DAILY fiscal flows.

I said economic indicators, not the stock market. You know they're not the same thing, right?

[ROB]

Correlating economic indicators with political leadership is almost always stoopid because economic reforms take years to take effect.

Utter bullshit. Hell, some people trade on DAILY fiscal flows.

I said economic indicators, not the stock market. You know they're not the same thing, right?

Why? The thread is literally about the stock market. If that isn't what you meant, then your comment is utterly out of context to the thread.