Moderator: coldharvest
Link173rd wrote:No claim to having inside info, or expertise. After a great deal of research however, I have come to the conclusion the towers were ultimately brought down by "us" through demolition, but only out of necessity to avoid much greater death and damage to the surrounding city.
Link173rd wrote:As you have mentioned, one would expect to hear floor to floor demo charges in the Towers collapse.
Many have said this is what they saw and heard.
Remember my description of the massive support structure in the center third of each building.
By all rights, after viewing so many other demolition events around the world, when the 'external" structure "slid" straight down to the ground, the internal bunker level structure of 12 elevator shafts embedded in 48 massive steel reinforced concrete pillars, surrounded by steel reinforced concrete boxes, should have been standing to this day.
I cannot yet accept the internal reinforced structure going down without very sophisticated demolition preparation. Here in Roanoke, VA we citizens watched for weeks as construction crews pounded at an old 10 story grainy under demolition. It too was constructed of solid steel reinforced concrete.
Link173rd wrote:I certainly see your points of contention. Maybe there in lies the difficulty I have in ignoring what seems obvious to my untrained eye. No engineering backgroung whatsoever.
Your example of the toilet roll also confuses me. If the toilet roll experiences a "bend" somewhere it would seem like that would be the point that would give to pressure,
and likely, at least intiatially to one side. No one watching the attacks would have been very surprise if at some point the area above impact had given at some weakest point, and toppled over.
I find myself struggling between having to believe the towers were so improperly constructed that they failed to respond to major fires as many other building have done
the conclusion of 700 architechs of the 9/11 for Truth organization,
and of course not being able to visualize the outer more fragile portion of the building not descending faster than the much more reinforced internal center.
In any case, you are convinced, and clearly seem more qualified to make a reasoned opinion. At this point I will just have to review the buiding specs, and construction video's to see if I can purge my perceptions to a different conclusion. Thanks for the insights!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 21 guests