And one, I'm afraid, is seriously in need of some of the critical self-examination he constantly urges on another. No names, no pack drill, but all other attempts to remedy having failed ... Sigh.Fansy wrote:you guys are serisouly gay
Moderator: coldharvest
And one, I'm afraid, is seriously in need of some of the critical self-examination he constantly urges on another. No names, no pack drill, but all other attempts to remedy having failed ... Sigh.Fansy wrote:you guys are serisouly gay
Penta wrote:Don't worry, pet. I'm not going to post the details of your behaviour on Friday (or anything else that could sully your reputation, for that matter). No one would believe me anyway. I could barely believe it myself from someone who prides himself on his ethics and presumes to lecture others. You just console yourself with pretending I'm mad. And telling everyone else I'm untrustworthy, I'm hateful, I make implied threats, when you've shown yourself to be not only sneaky, manipulative and extraordinarily unselfaware, but someone who uses threats and their execution as his stock in trade, as well as bare-faced cheating. They'll no doubt serve you well in your future career, in which I still wish you well.
I'm a big girl, and I shall do as I please from now on. I'll find guidance on moral philosophy and ethics elsewhere, from someone who doesn't use constant scolding and punishment as their teaching method of choice. Because while you may have mild sadistic tendencies, I am certainly not a mashochist. I'm tired of smoothing those cock-feathers, tired of conciliating, tired of apologising for minor, imaginary or unintended infractions of the rules, tired of being threatened with the big stick. Enough's enough.
Don't worry, pet. I'm not going to post the details of your behaviour on Friday (or anything else that could sully your reputation, for that matter).
I'm a big girl, and I shall do as I please from now on. I'll find guidance on moral philosophy and ethics elsewhere, from someone who doesn't use constant scolding and punishment as their teaching method of choice. Because while you may have mild sadistic tendencies, I am certainly not a mashochist. I'm tired of smoothing those cock-feathers, tired of conciliating, tired of apologising for minor, imaginary or unintended infractions of the rules, tired of being threatened with the big stick. Enough's enough.
And you're trying to suggest I was? Lovely. Is that what you were telling your mates when you were discussing me? Yup, that's a really good way of showing someone's mad, bad and dangerous to know. Just goes to show what I was saying about you being sneaky and manipulative: I'd have to add an outright liar if that's what you've been saying.Jäeger wrote:last I looked I wasn't the goofball threatening to splash people's personal information over the internet.
Of course I don't. Because I haven't been threatening you. I don't threaten people, though someone else has said it before: it seems to be a useful tactic.I've been threatened by some of the best and you don't even measure up.
Oh, I think you killed our friendship stone dead on Friday. I'm certainly not trying to kiss and make up.You don’t threaten me and then get to make try to make friends again so it goes away.
No, you didn't "call me out". You resorted to dirty tricks, and played the "confidentiality" card so I couldn't say so. Anything goes, does it, to preserve your reputation.someone pitiful enough to resort to threats because someone called her out
I've told you I won't.go ahead and do whatever you think you have to do
You're being ridiculous and malicious again.try to get me run off.
Sorry. You're not going to run me off either.Girl don't go away mad.... just go away.
A "threat"? Perhaps, but I'd say that's putting it a bit strong: more like some gentle pressure to try persuade you what the ethical thing for you to do in the circumstances would be. And that, dear boy, bears no relation whatsoever to "splashing your personal information".
Of course I don't. Because I haven't been threatening you. I don't threaten people,
Jäeger wrote:You make veiled statements about my political career
I wouldn't be the first to think those can be useful traits in a politician. I always hoped you'd be one of the exceptions.you've shown yourself to be not only sneaky, manipulative and extraordinarily unselfaware, but someone who uses threats and their execution as his stock in trade, as well as bare-faced cheating. They'll no doubt serve you well in your future career, in which I still wish you well.
No. Apologise for your dirty trickery. You're always "calling me out", tearing me to shreds, ripping me to bits, wielding the big stick; nothing new there. It was the low-down dirty trickery that I thought deserved acknowledgment and an apology, as you know. So it's dishonest to try to pretend otherwise.and tell me in PMs how I can make it all go away you'd let it go if I simply apolgise to you and acknwledge that I was wrong to call you out for trying to turn things back on me
which was in my last, farewell, PM to you and long after I'd given up trying to persuade you to do the right thing. Talk about taking things out of context (something else you like to accuse me of): it was in the context of the excuses I've made to myself for months now for your behaviour. I assume I'm allowed to quote my own PM to you, since you've already quoted one of yours to me.because you understand that I was beaten as a child and that I had a rough background
And I went on to sayAnyway, I'm past caring. I know I'm quite sane, though admittedly over-involved with the board. I've had enough of your rudeness and manipulation, the slurs on my integrity, your need always to be right, to save face. I'm tired of all the effort of smoothing those cock-feathers of yours, so easily ruffled, reminding myself over and over again that you're young, you were beaten, you've been damaged, you've had to and think you still have to be ultra-tough, never let down your guard.
I thought it was worth it, absorbing all that rage as well as fighting my own corner, because, partly in spite of all that, I was learning.
You can be fun, too, and sometimes almost kind, and I like you in spite of it all.
Here we go again. You know - you've agreed with me - that I have never called anyone a fascist on this board. We discussed it, in detail, and you accepted that was neither said nor intended. (Actually, it was another, early, example of you twisting what I said to suit your agenda. I should have taken that as an example of what would come later.) Misogynistic? Yes, I've called one or two people that, and with very good reason. PTSD: yes, I think it's pretty clear a few posters here over the years suffer from PTSD. But why would I accuse you of any of those?accuse me of thuggery or being a mysogynistic fascist with PTSD
follow through on your threats
because I remember you making some veiled threats to flipflop about his wife
some about "things you had on" M-A on the board
Penta wrote:
RYP wrote:two words...anger management.
Yes, I was very angry yesterday.
m-a wrote:how does that justify your threat to slander me with malicious hearsay?
There was no threat, as you know. But it was a mean-spirited comment, for which I apologise.
m-a wrote: wow, that is big of you. and i mean that, and not in a snarky way.
and you should know that by saying "i'm not going to call you a c##t" i didn't mean it to sound like i was endorsing it. i don't like the name calling from either side.
and i apologize if it did sound like an endorsement.
I can only imagine how much shit like that you've pulled in PMs and e-mails. It definitely seems to be a pattern.
You mean this?
No. Apologise for your dirty trickery.
which was in my last, farewell, PM to you and long after I'd given up trying to persuade you to do the right thing. Talk about taking things out of context (something else you like to accuse me of): it was in the context of the excuses I've made to myself for months now for your behaviour. I assume I'm allowed to quote my own PM to you, since you've already quoted one of yours to me.
Here we go again. You know - you've agreed with me - that I have never called anyone a fascist on this board. We discussed it, in detail, and you accepted that was neither said nor intended. (Actually, it was another, early, example of you twisting what I said to suit your agenda. I should have taken that as an example of what would come later.) Misogynistic? Yes, I've called one or two people that, and with very good reason. PTSD: yes, I think it's pretty clear a few posters here over the years suffer from PTSD. But why would I accuse you of any of those?
some about "things you had on" M-A on the board
And again. Yes, I mentioned, meanly, as a retort to something she said (whose tone I had also misunderstood), that I'd heard some gossip. And this was the upshot:Penta wrote:RYP wrote:two words...anger management.
Yes, I was very angry yesterday.m-a wrote:how does that justify your threat to slander me with malicious hearsay?
There was no threat, as you know. But it was a mean-spirited comment, for which I apologise.m-a wrote: wow, that is big of you. and i mean that, and not in a snarky way.
and you should know that by saying "i'm not going to call you a c##t" i didn't mean it to sound like i was endorsing it. i don't like the name calling from either side.
As RYP said in the earlier post I quoted (and he wasn't referring only to me): two words...anger management. You need to chill out.
Bye now, you fat bastard. ;)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests