Moderator: coldharvest
That's not strictly true either. They weren't anti- but pro-Israel and the post didn't even mention Gaza. And my argument with him focused on what he called my "deflection" of his first post in the thread, where I was actually trying to avoid getting into another of our long, tiresome and forever unresolvable arguments about Israel/Palestine (an example of where if I take one piece of advice I can end up falling foul of another), and why he gratuitously called me the most hateful poster on the board. I had already (and immediately) conceded his three other criticisms.Remember this whole thing with Jaeger started when he flagged up a ludricrous post she put up about jews in Europe being anti-Israel over Gaza
People's grandmothers are usually the most vulnerable members of their family, and as I said, from the little I know about J's, I rather like her. I was not "going for" J's family in general, or his grandmother in particular; I wasn't using his grandmother as a dig at him, as he suggests: I was simply saying he needn't worry about his family as far as I am concerned; I am no threat to them, and have made no threats to or about them. The trouble is, when you (and he) start viewing everything I say or do through the lenses of my supposed evil monstrousness, you interpret it all as malicious. I do have a remaining trace of malice towards you (as well as some sympathy, as you know), and I've never denied that, but I also try very hard to keep it in check, in the face of much provocation (as I expect you would concede). But I have none for Jaeger, as I hope I've made abundantly clear by now.Really, you can relax: I promise your granny's safe from my demonic grasp.
but it's not really fair or honest when I can't (and won't, of course) mention the extra context you gave me confidentially, is it?
Thank you. Thank you for taking the time to explain. And it does explain, a lot. Jaeger was right.
I'm truly sorry. I understand now why what I said about your wife, when I said it, hurt so much. And Iraq, of course.
Even his idea that I have a little clique of supporters to whom I constantly write of my woes, appealing for support, or that I beg RYP to intercede on my behalf:
Jäeger wrote:.
You also told me that Pelton made flipflop come back to him hat in hand apologising profusely and admitting that it was all his fault. That's why you came back remember, because you were vindicated.
seektravelinfo wrote:Penta, my advice to you, my two cents; unsolicited, is that you let this go. You just drop it. Browze the board for worthwhile topics and share your insights on those. Do not continue this unpleasant and provocative tit for tat and he said this and she said this and then she went and did this and it made him do that and he is a liar and she is a liar ad nauseum. It's the past, it's over. Not everything has to have a resolution and be tied up into a nice tidy package with a pretty red bow.
Same thing with begging RYP to intercede; YOU told me that during your meltdown that Pelton and you were trying to sort the whole situation. You also told me that Pelton made flipflop come back to him hat in hand apologising profusely and admitting that it was all his fault.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests