Buzzsaw wrote:This was a "quick question"?
He didn't say anything about a quick answer.
Moderator: coldharvest
Buzzsaw wrote:This was a "quick question"?
Buzzsaw wrote:I rarely post here anymore and am probably long forgotten. But I have a suggestion to resolve this debate to (mostly my) satisfaction.
Why not tell her that she is welcome back? Let her re-register. And then as soon as she starts her first thread, immediately ban her again.
Rinse and repeat. Hilarity will ensue.
A prince among men. Lurk less, post more friend.Buzzsaw wrote:Why not tell her that she is welcome back? Let her re-register. And then as soon as she starts her first thread, immediately ban her again.
Rinse and repeat. Hilarity will ensue.
seektravelinfo wrote:oh hell yeah, invite her back. what's in the past is in the past. it's been rather phlegmatic around here, truly, what is the harm in letting her back in ?
As long as Kurt stays I'm fine w/it.
svizzerams wrote:seektravelinfo wrote:oh hell yeah, invite her back. what's in the past is in the past. it's been rather phlegmatic around here, truly, what is the harm in letting her back in ?
As long as Kurt stays I'm fine w/it.
Yep - this would be my preferred outcome as well....
seektravelinfo wrote:oh hell yeah, invite her back. what's in the past is in the past. it's been rather phlegmatic around here, truly, what is the harm in letting her back in ?
As long as Kurt stays I'm fine w/it.
muskrat wrote:She is on RYP's FB, which seems to be where all the action is these days. No issues there.
It seems Mach is back also, again.
Cheers M.
muskrat wrote:Not sure Rickshaw but this fits his MO.
http://cafe.comebackalive.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=55870
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests