Moderator: yorick
friendlyskies wrote:Because I am sooooo loving unemployment.
Andrei Mendierej, the amateur filmmaker from Smolensk who shot this film is now dead.
He was stabbed near Kijow, and transported in critical condition to the hospital in Kijow.
There three unidentified individuals unplugged him from life support system and stabbed him three more times.
Andrei was pronounced dead that afternoon.
Russian government claims it was a coincidence.
Then the deputy head of the Polish Church was killed in a car accident returning home from funeral ceremonies for President Lech Kaczynski.
The PAN designation is likely a meaningless term used simply so the mission can be called something that will not give away its identity during integration with the launcher. The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) has used phony mission designations for years at the Cape.
Sri Lanky wrote:I abandoned the stock market years ago,cashed in my blue chips,and went for a ride into the wild blue yonder. I do not care about the market god anymore.
The 'disaster' in the Gulf of Mexico is beyond a false flag; it's an illusion.... I cannot reveal my sources, they do go straight to the top...The Government, corporations, and the people behind them have pulled out all the stops to insure the truth doesn't come out. They are the reason why the beaches have private security contractors, insuring no one is able to gain access to the oil on shore. They are the reason the Gulf of Mexico is a no fly zone. They are the reason why the gulf states are being locked down by military. They are the reason why the well head you see is different in many videos that BP releases. Without this measure of control the illusion would fail....
The large oil spills washing up on the shores are not from BP Deep Horizon. They are indeed from surrounding wells, that were already leaking by design. These wells can be verified through a simple online search. You'll notice that much of the oil is actually in the form of tar. Usually tar balls; sizes of these have reached 2000+ pounds.
From the start, BP, Haliburton, and co-conspirators knew where they were drilling. Using specific equipment, such as the German ship RV Sonne, they had detailed maps of the ocean bottom. The ship, and a specific college study from 2005, in the Gulf of Mexico, are your starting points to what's really happening in the gulf. Here's a link to what the study synopses http://geology.about.com/cs/volcanology/a/aa051604a.htm
What BP, Haliburton, and other co-conspirators intentionally drilled into was an Asphalt Volcano. Sounds scary doesn't it? It really is not. In fact, after you read the above link you'll know that the Gulf of Mexico is literally coated in oil, tar, and methane hydrate at the bottom.... BP, Haliburton, and other co-conspirators drilled intentionally into the 'mid side' of this particular asphalt volcano. Basically from what I understand, it is a soda bottle effect. If they had drilled into the top of the volcano, then all the gas would rise out, and explode as would bottled carbonated liquid. The effect of drilling into the side permits a safely controlled release of gas, tar, liquified asphalt, and other related gases....
The Asphalt volcano was a win win situation for this false flag: as it presented the best illusion to all outside parties. Not only do the conspirators need to fool the general public, but also the oil industry, and scientific community. The public is easy to fool, but the latter two groups take a little more effort; this is the main reason why the Gulf is being isolated by security contractors, and military....watching the videos, or live feeds looks horrible, and very ominous, but upon closer examination the tell tale signs of what it really is shows through, what you are actually viewing is a man made(well bore) large "Black Smoker"....several of the live feeds have been proven to be tampered footage, or faked.
http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3Den9CoYb0OHs
...We've all seen the videos of beaches not lined so much with oil, but with tar balls of varying sizes. Also, we've all noticed BP's overall lack of concern for cleanup. We've seen booms which aren't tied together. We've heard first hand account of staged clean ups on the beaches. As soon as a press conference, or media event is done BP stops work. The reason is simple, it's not that they don't care, but that they already know what's gonna happen. The oil will start naturally being cleaned up via decomposition, oil eating organisms, and falling to the already naturally tar covered bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.
...corexit9500, and other dispersant's are not needed. They are purposely being sprayed by Evergreen Air/CIA to cull the population along the Gulf Coast.... These are the populations living on welfare(in this area dominated by African Americans), and the older population living on Social Security(mainly Florida). These people are going to start dropping like flies over the next few years, and greatly reduce the burden to government coffers.... Anyone who has family anywhere near where they are spraying these chemicals need to alert their family to leave; they are the target of this false flag.... we all are the target on the grand scale. The target by way of the coming carbon tax, cap, and trade.
Optisoft has been down all along the Gulf Coast. He's been covering the story from the front lines. He has first hand visual evidence. Something I asked him about were scientists on the beach... He said during his time in Pensacola, and Grand Isle, he saw no scientists, or even students from Universities studying anything. Why are there no scientists???
I was expecting to drop my camera and start helping wildlife, but… Lo and behold, the beach was oil-slick free. We walked upon the beach and noticed tons of birds and dolphins and an orange oil boom stretching as far as you can see down the beach. The boom was about halfway from the coastline to the road, running along the beach. As we approached this boom to get clear shots of the dolphins that were just off shore, a Sheriff pulled up on a 4-wheeler. He would not speak on camera, but he did open up to me off-record once I mentioned "We The People". Below is what he told me:
1) The entire state was up in arms as to why NOTHING was done to prevent the slick from hitting shore. Once it hit, it sat for days, then BP began to act.
2) The news is bullshit, don't listen to it, any of it.
3) The oil is moving east, not west
4) The oil is coming to shore in giant waves, then none for a while
5) If the oil breaches the barrier islands and reaches the swamps and canals then LA is devastated economically as most of the economy relies on fishing, drilling, and processing the fish and oil. Many residents rely on fish for part of their diet - it’s a poor state.
6) If get within 50 feet or so of the ocean then you have to go through decontamination. They are calling the beach a red zone.... The entrance to the bridge had an SUV cop with his lights on, parked in the middle of the bridge. I pulled right up to him and said, "what, I can't go through?", he said "nope". I asked why and he said "short answer, because I told you so, long answer, talk to the operations center a few miles down another road. I said, "uh, Free Press? 1st Amendment?" He cared not. 2 more police came from the other side of the bridge, sporting blue lights on their 4-wheelers. I said fuck it and headed over to the operations center.
When I got to the operations center, a large group of Coast Guard was having a little get together under the center "homes are on stilts there". They were actually pretty cool. I explained what I was doing and wanting to know why I could not go across the bridge, which was public property. I asked if this was martial law. They arranged for me to speak with the public relations coordinator. Thanks Guards!
The coordinator explained to me that the land on the other side of the bridge, albeit massive and containing an entire port, was owned by two familes. Those 2 familes had made arrangements with BP and the state police to keep "researchers" and "press" off their land; however, to honor free press and 1st amendment, twice a day the select press would be escorted by police to a specific location where they could photograph and not explore. In essence, he said "your not going to see anything". They refused National Wildlife Federation access to this special press police escort - only a few press agencies were permitted....
http://www.wkrg.com/gulf_oil_spill/arti ... 0_8-46-pm/
I think it is more likely that they were drilling looking for supercritical water, which is found in tar volcanoes. . . at least "theorized." They applications for the oil refining industry, nuclear power and even recycling plastics would be enormous....From what I understand, it is water which is neither a liquid or a gas, due to extreme pressures and temperatures. It acts as a solvent, dissolving petroleum and distributing it through the water, as opposed to normal water where the oil separates and floats to the top. It can be used to break down plastics. It is also used in nuclear applications, and I BELIEVE it has to do something with cooling.
My best guess is that if you discovered a way to break down plastics into some reusable form, you'd be rich beyond even the super rich of today.... Likely, this is being funded by our military which is now the ruling body of our nation. They have an immense need for power, supercritical water would provide much of that. That's why there is so much military in the area and so much secrecy around this. They weren't really looking for oil as much as they were looking for something else.
Corexit[1] is a product line of solvents primarily used as a dispersant for breaking up oil slicks. It is produced by Nalco Holding Company which is associated with BP and Exxon.[2] Corexit is the most-used dispersant in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, with COREXIT 9527 having been replaced by COREXIT 9500 after the former was deemed too toxic.[3] Oil that would normally rise to the surface of the water is broken up by the dispersant into small globules that can then remain suspended in the water, potentially forming underwater plumes of oil.[4]
Corexit 9527
The proprietary composition is not public, but the manufacturer's own safety data sheet on Corexit EC9527A says the main components are 2-butoxyethanol and a proprietary organic sulfonate with a small concentration of propylene glycol.[14][15]
[edit]Corexit 9500
In response to public pressure, the EPA and Nalco released the list of the six ingredients in Corexit 9500, revealing constituents including sorbitan, butanedioic acid, and petroleum distillates.[3] Corexit EC9500A is mainly comprised of hydrotreated light petroleum distillates, propylene glycol and a proprietary organic sulfonate.[16] Environmentalists also pressured Nalco to reveal to the public what concentrations of each chemical are in the product; Nalco considers that information to be a trade secret, but has shared it with the EPA.[17] Propylene glycol is a chemical commonly used as a solvent or moisturizer in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, and is of relatively low toxicity. An organic sulfonate (or organic sulfonic acid salt) is a synthetic chemical detergent, that acts as a surfactant to emulsify oil and allow its dispersion into water. The identity of the sulfonate used in both forms of Corexit was disclosed to the EPA in June 2010, as dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate.[18]
[edit]Toxicity
The relative toxicity of Corexit and other dispersants are difficult to determine due to a scarcity of scientific data.[3] The manufacturer's safety data sheet states "No toxicity studies have been conducted on this product," and later concludes "The potential human hazard is: Low."[19] According to the manufacturer's website, workers applying Corexit should wear breathing protection and work in a ventilated area.[20] Compared with 12 other dispersants listed by the EPA, Corexit 9500 and 9527 are either similarly toxic or 10 to 20 times more toxic.[7] In another preliminary EPA study of eight different dispersants, Corexit 9500 was found to be less toxic to some marine life than other dispersants and to break down within weeks, rather than settling to the bottom of the ocean or collecting in the water.[21] None of the eight products tested are "without toxicity", according to an EPA administrator, and the ecological effect of mixing the dispersants with oil is unknown, as is the toxicity of the breakdown products of the dispersant.[21]
Corexit 9527, considered by the EPA to be an acute health hazard, is stated by its manufacturer to be potentially harmful to red blood cells, the kidneys and the liver, and may irritate eyes and skin.[22][13] The chemical 2-butoxyethanol, found in Corexit 9527, was identified as having caused lasting health problems in workers involved in the cleanup of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.[23] According to the Alaska Community Action on Toxics, the use of Corexit during the Exxon Valdez oil spill caused people "respiratory, nervous system, liver, kidney and blood disorders".[15] Like 9527, 9500 can cause hemolysis (rupture of blood cells) and may also cause internal bleeding.[4]
But does anyone know what kind of plane this is?
Forebiddenknowledge wrote:
The side effects of this scam are negligible; in the eyes of the perpetrators, they've done nature a favor. They've opened up an asphalt volcano from the side, and will shut it down in the next few months by equalizing the pressure. The equalization of pressure will come by way of the two relief wells; which are not wells, but vents. when they do this, I have no clue what excuse they'll use, but the current gusher will stop. I said stop, it will not slow down, but literally stop. Remember, all they have done is aided nature in something that is a very common, and naturally occurring event at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.
BP Oil Spill: Clean-Up Crews Can't Find Crude in the Gulf
As Size of Slick Shrinks, Experts Say Oil is Breaking Up, Staying Below Surface
195 comments By JEFFREY KOFMAN
BURAS, La. July 26, 2010
PrintRSSFONT SIZE:SHARE:EmailTwitterFacebookMore
For 86 days, oil spewed into the Gulf of Mexico from BP's damaged well, dumping some 200 million gallons of crude into sensitive ecosystems. BP and the federal government have amassed an army to clean the oil up, but there's one problem -- they're having trouble finding it.
The leak is capped and the spill appears to be shrinking, but where is it going?
Watch 'World News' for the latest coverage on the Gulf oil spill.
At its peak last month, the oil slick was the size of Kansas, but it has been rapidly shrinking, now down to the size of New Hampshire.
Today, ABC News surveyed a marsh area and found none, and even on a flight out to the rig site Sunday with the Coast Guard, there was no oil to be seen.
"That oil is somewhere. It didn't just disappear," said Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser.
Salvador Cepriano is one of the men searching for crude. Cepriano, a shrimper, has been laying out boom with his boat, but he's found that there's no oil to catch.
"I think it is underneath the water. It's in between the bottom and the top of the water," Cepriano said.
Even the federal government admits that locating the oil has become a problem.
"It is becoming a very elusive bunch of oil for us to find," said National Incident Cmdr. Thad Allen.
Skimmers Pick Up Less Oil
The numbers don't lie: two weeks ago, skimmers picked up about 25,000 barrels of oily water. Last Thursday, they gathered just 200 barrels.
Still, it doesn't mean that all the oil that gushed for weeks is gone. Thousands of small oil patches remain below the surface, but experts say an astonishing amount has disappeared, reabsorbed into the environment.
"[It's] mother nature doing her job," said Ed Overton, a professor of environmental studies at Louisiana State University.
The light crude began to deteriorate the moment it escaped at high pressure, and then it was zapped with dispersants to speed the process along. The oil that did make it to the ocean's surface was broken up by 88-degree water, baked by 100-degree sun, eaten by microbes, and whipped apart by wind and waves.
Related
WATCH: Where Is Gulf Oil Going?WATCH: Oil Still Leaks From Gulf Oil WellWATCH: Oil and Water Don't Mix; Valdez and the Gulf
Experts stress that even though there's less and less oil as time goes on, there's still plenty around the spill site. And in the long term, no one knows what the impact of those hundreds of millions of gallons will be, deep in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests