Moderator: coldharvest
Old Blue wrote:Interesting thought. I'll mull that one. Haven't heard it advocated much. Except by Baluchis.
Thanks.
me: yeah. he's probaby getting his news straight from the cow's mouth. I mean horse's. Pardon me.
Sent at 1:08 AM on Saturday
XXXXXXX: no, he does that
all of Stanton's other articles are very obviously cut and pasted directly from emails (even the language is unchanged, and has wild swings of tone and voice)
he's so bad at concealing his sources that every time he writes something we know exactly who leaked it
so people have begun getting fired for it... which results in more "sources say" articles from him about how the people are so very persecuted
which I won't do if this site and its contents are meant to be private.
Cold, are you actually having a conversation with one of them heathen milbloggers? Oh the shame of it all....
Old Blue wrote:I'm hip on all of that except the reformation of Baluchistan. I'd like to hear why you bring that up. Rather uncommon, and I'm interested to hear it.
I've advocated involving the Iranians in establishing / reforming the (Sharia based) MoJ. We have no ability to mentor Islamic judges, and their court system is fucked. We don't like the Iranian court system, but it's more like what the Afghans actually prefer. The Afghans weren't as hung up on the differences between Shia and Sunni except for the extremists, anyway. The courts, especially the corruption in the courts, are a big IO gain for the Taliban. In areas where the Taliban are strong enough, one of the first things that they do is set up courts... and they get business. That's really bad for the government, because one whole leg of the three-legged stool becomes irrelevant. Classic Maoist insurgent tactics, and we are being schooled.
maxforte wrote:P.S.: Are these messages visible to anyone on the Internet, without logging in? I can't believe I am only now thinking about this question. This has to do with my wanting to copy and paste Old Blue's chat quote, which I won't do if this site and its contents are meant to be private. I don't necessarily buy the quote, but I like that it raises different possibilities and angles.
maxforte wrote:P.S.: Are these messages visible to anyone on the Internet, without logging in? I can't believe I am only now thinking about this question. This has to do with my wanting to copy and paste Old Blue's chat quote, which I won't do if this site and its contents are meant to be private. I don't necessarily buy the quote, but I like that it raises different possibilities and angles.
nowonmai wrote:Up the minute scorecard.
coldharvest wrote:...and ask yourself this, do you think they would have allowed 'blogging' during WW2?
you stupid millbitch
'look at me, I have inside dope, aren't I awesome?'
Jumper wrote:Holy cow, am I actually seeing a civil exchange on the flag? Cold, are you actually having a conversation with one of them heathen milbloggers? Oh the shame of it all....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests