Moderator: coldharvest
svizzerams wrote:You didn't give anyone much to work with...the problem may be the query design and the ebonics syntax.
if you don't know what the hell is going on, don't say shit.
Fansy wrote:marie-angelique wrote:if you are so happy, why did you bother asking in the first place?
i wish, honestly, that i could understand and/or reply to the responses in this thread. but, as exemplified by this type of shit above, all these comments lack even the minimal amount of rigor that would make them relevant to my situation or original question.
E. FUKN G.:
MA: what does my happiness have to do with my askin this question? how are the two at all mutually exclusive in a sane world?
kurt/cold: why can't she be dumb and I be lazy instead of she being smart and me trying hard to fool her? which is more fukn likely?
v: besides being generally wrong, a,b,c, and d all ignore the real possibility that SHE IS DUMB and I AM TOO LAZY TO TRY AT ALL TO FOOL HER BECAUSE SHE IS PRETTY DUMB AND I KNOW ITS PRETTY EASY TO GET AWAY WITH UNLESS I JUST AM INCREDIBLY LAZY AND SAY SHIT LIKE "come over i got 20 minutes lets fuck then you can go back to work".
swine: there may be a men's cosmo for these questions, BUT DO YOU THINK I'D POST THIS SHIT IN THERE OVER RANTS AND OPINIONS AT THE BFC FAGGOT?
elso: wtf does this shit have to do with anything?
kurt#2: i dont want to hear about your erotic male pimply fantasies. why would you assume I or this girl fit the ridiculous profiles you created? I mean srsly before runnin with these silly age-based stereotypes might want to know ages of those involved.
i mean. really. how hard is it for people to consider their responses in light of what they DONT KNOW about shit. you people lack so much conversational rigor its fukn sad.
Fansy wrote:svizzerams wrote:You didn't give anyone much to work with...the problem may be the query design and the ebonics syntax.
so its my fault you all assume random shit and don't question the shit you assume before you spout your dumb shit? sorry, i'm not taking the blame for you all constantly talkin out of yer asses.
there's actually this easy rule to follow: if you don't know what the hell is going on, don't say shit. but if you want to say shit, start by figuring out what the hell is going on.
how do i keep a girl thinking that i like her for her mind
vlindsay wrote:Fansy wrote:marie-angelique wrote:if you are so happy, why did you bother asking in the first place?
i wish, honestly, that i could understand and/or reply to the responses in this thread. but, as exemplified by this type of shit above, all these comments lack even the minimal amount of rigor that would make them relevant to my situation or original question.
E. FUKN G.:
MA: what does my happiness have to do with my askin this question? how are the two at all mutually exclusive in a sane world?
kurt/cold: why can't she be dumb and I be lazy instead of she being smart and me trying hard to fool her? which is more fukn likely?
v: besides being generally wrong, a,b,c, and d all ignore the real possibility that SHE IS DUMB and I AM TOO LAZY TO TRY AT ALL TO FOOL HER BECAUSE SHE IS PRETTY DUMB AND I KNOW ITS PRETTY EASY TO GET AWAY WITH UNLESS I JUST AM INCREDIBLY LAZY AND SAY SHIT LIKE "come over i got 20 minutes lets fuck then you can go back to work".
swine: there may be a men's cosmo for these questions, BUT DO YOU THINK I'D POST THIS SHIT IN THERE OVER RANTS AND OPINIONS AT THE BFC FAGGOT?
elso: wtf does this shit have to do with anything?
kurt#2: i dont want to hear about your erotic male pimply fantasies. why would you assume I or this girl fit the ridiculous profiles you created? I mean srsly before runnin with these silly age-based stereotypes might want to know ages of those involved.
i mean. really. how hard is it for people to consider their responses in light of what they DONT KNOW about shit. you people lack so much conversational rigor its fukn sad.
Well at least we can all rest assured that she doesn't want him for his mind......
redharen wrote:If people don't know what's going on, it's your own fault.
Unless the whole point was to pose a question that couldn't be answered to your satisfaction so that you could berate people for not being able to answer it.
vlindsay wrote:Well at least we can all rest assured that she doesn't want him for his mind......
Fansy wrote:so may you all have a terrible day/life, and may your unchallenged, bullshit assumptions lead to your immediate and painful deaths or at least may you end up looking like the gaping swampy assholes from which you regularly seep your coprophilic commentary.
Penta wrote:As another idiot who talks out of my ass, so it's 2 and 3? You own land and people? I was going to go for 1 or 4. How disillusioning.
Fansy wrote:vlindsay wrote:Well at least we can all rest assured that she doesn't want him for his mind......
so its either my:
1) looks
2) money
3) power
4) ability in bed
SHIT YOUVE BACKED ME INTO A TOUGH CORNER HERE. CLEVER GIRL.
see 2:10+. cracker comments:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG4f9zR5yzY
marie-angelique wrote:
you forgot:
5) low self esteem
6) attracted to losers
7) being with inferior guy makes her feel superior
8) she is using you to cheat on her boyfriend
give me time, i can think of others....
Unless the whole point was to pose a question that couldn't be answered to your satisfaction so that you could berate people for not being able to answer it.
that wasn't the point, but i acknowledged it as a possibility. it was just unfortunate that the confederacy of dunces took their assumptions and ran a marathon with them. at such a time, it's incumbent on me to correct faggotry in the world.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 85 guests