Moderator: coldharvest
JamesInTheWorld wrote:Hmmmm...
Exactly what does this mean?
~JITW
ktrout wrote:In the comments on the article about it at "The Economist" the Euro bigots are looking down their noses at us, of course.
I thought the paper was a conservative rag...
ktrout wrote:JamesInTheWorld wrote:Hmmmm...
Exactly what does this mean?
~JITW
Gun bans can now be challenged as unconstitutional. It's progress. I let out a "whoohooo!" and pretended to shoot a gun in the air when I heard it on the radio. On NPR, no less.
My real one remained in my pocket :).
Caliban wrote:That must have been reassuring for the people in the cars next to you. The screaming man in the next car was only pointing pistol fingers in their general direction. I imagine there are still police patrols and white coated orderlies with nets still looking for you.
Kurt wrote:But while the existing laws are on the books, the ban in NYC and other places are still valid.
Plus the Supremes gave their ruling but handed it down to the lower courts to enforce. I would guess that if I had some kind of pistol in my apartment without the proper permits here in NYC I would be cited, and then a lower court here in the city would uphold that citation.
But still...better than nothing.
ktrout wrote:JamesInTheWorld wrote:Hmmmm...
Exactly what does this mean?
~JITW
Gun bans can now be challenged as unconstitutional. It's progress. I let out a "whoohooo!" and pretended to shoot a gun in the air when I heard it on the radio. On NPR, no less.
My real one remained in my pocket :).
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 116 guests