MJK wrote:I just cannot wrap my head around why you and Seeks, who seem otherwise cognitive of the world around you fail to perceive how much bigger the threat of WW3 is with Hillary. Libya had the highest standard of living in Africa and I was all set to go looking for the remains of Sgt Vernon Moore when she and her minions looted the place and turned it into Iraqfrica. At least with Trump his rapport with Putin means I might live to harvest next year's crop of potatoes before nuclear winter sets in.
These are good points. But Clinton just means four more years of Obama or Bill Clinton. Which didn't lead to WWIII, well, arguably, and the economy did fabulously compared to conservative administrations. Sure, she's a statist empire builder and therefore dangerous, but it's exactly the kind of danger the entire world has set itself up to mitigate. Trump, on the other hand, is a batshit insane classical narcissist convinced of his own omniscience and dead set on winning omnipotence so he can enforce his bigoted worldview using the most powerful military in the world. NOPE NOPE NOPE.
But, if Gary Johnson does well in the debates, his poll numbers hit a certain critical mass, and he specifically denounces some of the more batshit libertarian policies, such as getting rid of the social safety net, I'd certainly consider voting for him instead of Clinton. At which point I hope you can once again masturbate to my super sexy friendlyskies avatar in peace.