More Third Worlding in America

[MJK]

Mueller and Barr are cut from the same bolt of cloth, one dyed red and the other blue. Both specialize in coverups. Barr advised(like he needed prompting)GHW Bush with appropriate legal noises to pardon the Iran Contra Dancers. Mueller sat on proof that Mohammed Atta never went to Prague to meet Saddam's crew, to help facilitate what would become another victory in the export of democracy to the oppressed. When these two go 'toe to toe' the loser is always those in the cheap seats. They are both puppets.

[snaark]

Mueller sat on proof that Mohammed Atta never went to Prague to meet Saddam's crew, to help facilitate what would become another victory in the export of democracy to the oppressed.

Which hysterical conspiracy theory website did you get that gem from?

[MJK]

Mr snaark, it is on Wikipedia among other 'conspiracy' sites. Do you ever even check yourself before you slam the posts that do not fit the narrative that you have been issued and are comfy with? I can cut your food up for you but you have to chew it yourself.

As an aside, did you even LOOK at New Eastern Outlook or Voltairenet before declaring me paranoid? Well, did you, Chester? Or were you busy hoping your pal Spike would notice that you are barking at a cat? Quit with the vaccuous ROB like one liners and admit the two are Doppelgängers from a perspective of what their accomplishments really are.

[snaark]

I don't know why i did this, but it took me about 2 mins to find out that the founder of Voltairnet is a 9/11 "truther".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thierry_Meyssan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11:_The_Big_Lie

I'm not even going to bother looking at the other site, because you are a fucking moron.

[MJK]

Half of the Cpngressmen who sat on the 9/11 commission think the same way. Have you checked their work or are we dealing with another narrative you have been issued? If someone is from say a different religion do you automatically dismiss every other thing they have to say? Instead of calling Narrative Central to ask what you should think, try going to Mayssan's website and actually reading what he has to say about Africa, Lebanon or the greater Middle East. His take on how France was left holding an empty bag in Libya is very interesting. Or William Engdahl's work at New Eastern Outlook. Those folks with him there have a decidedly left/socialist slant but even though that isn't my cup of tea I learn much by reading their stuff.

Also snaarky, any time you think you can refute points I can make (with published facts) about 9/11 instead of spewing pseudo pithy comments you hope will draw a crowd of fellow coward kickers you just step on up. And when you revert to that hackneyed fallback I will point it out in terms that leave no question in anyone's mind that your polemics are but a bag of thrice passed gas that you have never closely examined yet huff and parrot ad infinitum.

[ROB]

Half of the Cpngressmen who sat on the 9/11 commission think the same way.

Have you read the 911 Commission Report? Like actually have a copy of it and read it? It's freely available online and you can get it on Amazon.

Or do you rely on what Prison Planet said about it?

[ROB]

I'm not even going to bother looking at the other site, because you are a fucking moron.

And therein lies the problem. He's so dumb that most of the time he doesn't even realise when he's been humiliated.

I mean, practically everyone here changes angle when they get tagged, but good ol' MJK just keeps trucking with the same shit.

[Alphabet]

I'm not even going to bother looking at the other site, because you are a fucking moron.

And therein lies the problem. He's so dumb that most of the time he doesn't even realise when he's been humiliated.

I mean, practically everyone here changes angle when they get tagged, but good ol' MJK just keeps trucking with the same shit.

Or maybe......just maybe, “Because he's the hero BFC deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hunt him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A dark knight.”


I mean....It isn't a stretch that more than a few of us here need a whipping boy when our respective govt investigators might pay a visit.



"Ja........I know I posted that, but let me tell you about this MJK dude."

[ROB]

The fall guy... for life.

[MJK]

Got to get to work, but snaarkster, let's briefly revisit the Barr-Mueller thing. You asked me where I got my info from and I told you it was on Wikipedia amongst other places. You must have been relieved that I mentioned something else so you could forget that I was right and go off the rails. Then you used that same source to produce 'evidence' to try weakly to mock me. But here I am bringing it back up. I predict that you will never acknowledge that you were wrong; you never do. Barr and Mueller are both coverup specialists. I stated it; you mocked it; then you found on one of YOUR favorite sources and promptly memory-holed it. What did that feel like?

Always glad to provide the fatherly guidance that eludes you in your life.

[snaark]

I'm not going to look at it because I already know it's stupid, like all of the sources you post here. Nor is it even relevant. Do you think this somehow discredits the Mueller enquiry? Is this your best attempt at explaining away the results? Because it's pretty a pretty fucking weak argument.

I don't know what sort of pathology draws people like you to conspiracy theories. My suspicion is that its mainly due to naivety and inexperience. I mean, if you think there are organisations that are competent enough to carry out such conspiracies, then you've clearly never worked for the government or a large corporation.

[MJK]

Nice to see you refrain from name calling and present a civil discourse. As for the relevancy of what I posted, it was on topic and therefore relevant. If you were to critically digest what I posted you would realize that I am not taking sides and view both Mueller and Barr as the left and right hands of the same magician. I don't buy into what Barr is selling any more than I do the Mueller report. I stated that they were the same critter on opposing sides of the mirror. If during your research journey you came across the Mueller info on his position during the run up to the Iraq war then you know that at least half of what I said was true. You hold no love for Barr so it should be easy to believe that he is a coverup artist but you needn't dig far to actually see proof to support that claim.

As for conspiracy theories, I may be a bit naive but at 63 I gots me mucho experience. There was a CIA memo released dating back to '64 directing the use of the newly coined term 'conspiracy theorist' to discredit anyone who did not buy into the official narrative of the Kennedy assassination. That is THE origin of the term. Really. Somewhere around 65% of Americans do not believe Oswald acted alone; that by definition there was a conspiracy. Do you believe in the Single Bullet Theory? Don't know where you are from so I don't know what your exposure level is on this, the Original Conspiracy Theory. GHW Bush claimed for years he could not recall where he was when Kennedy was shot; turns out he was staying just outside Dallas and scheduled to castigate the President in a speech but opted to tell those in attendance that in deference to our deceased leader he would not give the speech. A former employee of his, George DeMorneschild, squired Oswald around for the final two weeks of his life and committed suicide after being rebuffed by Bush. Rub this up against the fact(CHECK it) that when he was Vice President the father of the guy who shot President Reagan owed Bush around $700,000, a debt dismissed afterwards. Bush's son Neil was going to have dinner with the assassin's other brother that night. These are facts. Five hours after the shooting (while Reagan was still on the operating table) Bush closed the investigation. That is a fact. Were you aware of any of this? This is the stuff that can be proven but wasn't on TV so those like me who mention it get called CONSPIRACY THEORISTS. What are the odds that an assassin's family would have connections to the man who would become President if that assassin succeeded? Those who would dismiss those facts are essentially COINCIDENCE theorists. The TV told them what to think, the CIA told them what to call those with the temerity to think different.

Your comment on me having never worked for government meaning I do not understand that it is so incompetent as to not be able to keep secrets, did you know that the atom bomb project was known to 500,000 people in one form or another but Vice President Harry Truman had to be told about it when Roosevelt died? That is a good job of keeping secrets but I never said that the government itself killed Kennedy or pulled off 9/11.

If Kentucky Fried Chicken and Coca-Cola can keep their recipes a secret, why can't conspirators keep secrets?

[ROB]

As for conspiracy theories, I may be a bit naive but at 63 I gots me mucho experience. There was a CIA memo released dating back to '64 directing the use of the newly coined term 'conspiracy theorist' to discredit anyone who did not buy into the official narrative of the Kennedy assassination. That is THE origin of the term.

Other than the fact that the term was being used as early as the 1870s.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?c ... ry%3B%2Cc0

Seriously, this was like 18 seconds work to check. Just stop.

[snaark]

MJK, like many internet heroes you seem to think my unwillingness to engage with you is somehow vindication. It's not. Rather, it's simply me not wanting to waste my time. You've already proved yourself a moron and I don't think that's changed. So why would I waste my time reading up on conspiracy theories you post here? Seriously I barely even read your posts - I usually stop at the second sentence - so I don't even know what you're talking about most of the time. I just assume it's stupid.

[ROB]

Sure, but that is not how steel beams melt.